id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD FX-8320 3.5Ghz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8320 3.5Ghz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 57 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8320 3.5Ghz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8320 3.5Ghz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(83%)
57 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
83 0 100 57

 

Reviews

page 1 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-12-04, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • Abstract:  The launch of Socket AM3+ processors with Piledriver microarchitecture inspired many AMD fans. However, until recently we only based our opinion on the results obtained from the top model in the new AMD FX family. Today we are going to make up for this omission and carry out a detailed performance analysis of all Vishera processors with eight, six and four cores....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-25, Author: Hilbert , review by: guru3d.com

  • Abstract:  AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 processors performance analyzedAMD released the FX series Vishera - Piledriver based processor. And though everybody has been focusing on that most high-end AMD FX 8350 processor, another three processors have been relea...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, Author: Anand , review by: anandtech.com

  • Abstract:  Last year's launch of AMD's FX processors was honestly disappointing. The Bulldozer CPU cores that were bundled into each Zambezi chip were hardly power efficient and in many areas couldn't significantly outperform AMD's previous generation platform. Look...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-11-08, Author: Luca , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  These days there are basically two different groups of customers who demand lots of processing power: content creators and gamers, while this 2D performance comparison is targeting content creators. After having had a look at the following pages you'll ha...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-07-27, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • DefaultFirst of all we're going to have a closer look at performance differences with standard clock speeds From our overall performance rating we see that the Core i56600K is on average 1439 % quicker than the AMD FX8320 If we start searching for the ben...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-28, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  The first generation processors based on AMD's Bulldozer architecture did not meet expectations, so AMD is making a second attempt today, with FX 2.0 or Vishera. The Piledriver cores are a refinement and further development of Bulldozer, that are suppos...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-07-19, review by: computerbase.de

  • Abstract:  Maxon hat den beliebten weil kostenlosen und einfach zu handhabenden CPU-Benchmark Cinebench neu aufgelegt. Sechs Jahre nach Cinebench R15 folgt Cinebench R20 mit neuer Engine und neuer Projektdatei...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-03-11, review by: computerbase.de

  • Abstract:  tl;dr: Maxon hat den beliebten weil kostenlosen und einfach zu handhabenden CPU-Benchmark Cinebench neu aufgelegt. Sechs Jahre nach Cinebench R15 folgt Cinebench R20 mit neuer Engine und neuer Projektdatei. ComputerBase hat eigene Benchmarks erstellt und...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-01-15, Author: Carsten , review by: pcgameshardware.de

  • Abstract:  Auch im Jahr 2015 stammt die neueste Prozessorenreihe auf dem Markt von Intel. Der Chipgigant hat seine Haswell-E-Reihe im Spätsommer 2014 offiziell vorgestellt (zum PCGH-Test des i7-5960X und i7-5820K) und seitdem sind auch die ersten Achtkern-Prozessor...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×