id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Pentax K-m



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Pentax K-m

Testseek.com have collected 51 expert reviews of the Pentax K-m and the average rating is 78%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Pentax K-m.
Award: Most Awarded December 2008
December 2008
 
(78%)
51 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
78 0 100 51

 

Reviews

page 1 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-02-21, review by: electronicsme.com

  • If you're a point-and-shoot or digital super zoom user, and you're ready to take the step up to an SLR, the Pentax K-m makes an excellent choice. Everything about the camera is aimed at the entry-level market, including the price. When compared to the ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2009-03-16, Author: Gavin , review by: techworld.com

  • Those looking to make the jump from digital compact to more fully featured (and better performing) digital SLR will discover the Pentax K-m a very competent example. Given its current price it’s also something of a bargain for the beginner, coming wit...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-02-26, review by: v3.co.uk

  • Light and compact; fast, responsive and user friendly; colourful and crisp results
  • Slight under-exposure; no Live View facility
  • The Pentax K-m camera is a good-value reliable camera that will do most of what you want and won’t break the bank Good points Light and compact; fast, responsive and user friendly; colourful and crisp results Bad points Slight under-exposure; no Liv...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2009-01-30, review by: dpreview.com

  • Easy-to-use on-screen control panel, Compact size with good build-quality, Plenty of features for the first-time user (Auto Pict mode/Help button), Efficient image stabilization, Reliable flash exposure, Wireless flash, Good viewfinder for its class, In-c...
  • Default JPEGs too contrasty and poorly sharpened, JPEG engine not making the most out the cameras RAW data, Unsophisticated, uninformative AF system with no indication of chosen point in viewfinder, No orientation sensor (get used to landscape images), Dy...
  • The entry-level DSLR sector has become argue ably the hardest-fought camera sector over the past year. Reduced-spec, cheaper DSLRs have appeared from all the major camera companies, looking to tempt compact camera users across to the will it fit in m...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2009-01-23, review by: whatdigitalcamera.com

  • Value, compact size, silver flash design, prompt AF, image detail, tone.
  • AEB/selftimer conflict, noisy AF with kit lens, underexposure
  • Differentiating with a range of DSLRs can often prove problematic for a manufacturer. The manufacturer can either focus on restricting the inner workings of the camera to keep costs down, or simply alter the design and size to the same end. Pentax has...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(89%)
 
  Published: 2008-12-06, review by: photographyblog.com

  • The new Pentax K-m is another excellent addition to Pentaxs DSLR range. Seamlessly slotting in below the K200D, it offers a simpler and more intuitive layout that will suit beginners better. The retro top LCD panel has been replaced with a more glamo...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2010-04-23, review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • Simply superb value for money, combined with very few missing features, make this camera a good choice ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-24, review by: macworld.com.au

  • Abstract:  Priced affordably with both an 18mm to 55mm and 50mm to 200mm kit lenses, Pentax’s 10.2-megapixel K2000 (sold in Australia as the ) may tempt quite a few people to jump into the digital SLR pool. Though the supposed niche for the KM consists of consume...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2009-07-09, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Very decent picture quality , Useful and fun digital filter effects , In-camera RAW processing , Speedy performance
  • Rear command dial too near to optical viewfinder , Noisy kit lens , Inconsistent metering , Inaccurate automatic white balance when shooting indoors
  • We like the K-m and the image quality it offers, but having to fumble over the inconsistent metering and white balance can be an issue for users not familiar with manual exposure controls....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2009-06-25, review by: smh.com.au

  • The camera continues the Pentax style of no-nonsense SLRs. There are no gimmicky concessions to customers moving up from compact cameras. Every function is a genuine photographic tool. The Pentax kit lens is particularly fine. Image quality is excepti...
  • The camera has one serious flaw. JPEG images straight from the camera are unimpressive both in sharpness and in colour. We are at a loss to understand this because the RAW images are excellent. JPEG and RAW can be recorded simultaneously, so in one se...
  • If you can live with the RAW file system - and that, after all, is the way to get better images with any camera - then the Pentax is a fine camera. And the supplied Silkypix RAW converter is excellent. This is a low-cost entry into the serious photogr...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×