Testseek.com have collected 171 expert reviews of the OCZ 2.5 inch Vector 180 Series SATA600 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for OCZ 2.5 inch Vector 180 Series SATA600.
March 2015
(84%)
171 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
The OCZ Vector 180 480GB is not at the top of the performance league, although it scored adequately in all the tests. Sequential read and write speeds were a bit lower than those quoted by OCZ, and 2MB sequential and random benchmarks could be also higher...
Published: 2015-07-19, Author: stefan , review by: madshrimps.be
The Vector 180 from OCZ takes part from their high-end offerings and besides the useful Power Failure Management Plus (PFM+) addition, we do also benefit from the ShieldPlus warranty which implies no shipping costs and no extra hassles. The performances o...
Published: 2015-07-18, Author: Bruno , review by: reviewstudio.net
nice aspect, performance, accessories, OCZ Guru software
price
OCZ made a very good SSD and bundled it with the Guru software to maintain the drive's performance for a longer time.Even if it is not the cheapest drive in its class, the performance can't be overlooked.PROsCONs - nice aspect- performance- accessories- O...
Published: 2015-06-25, Author: Victor , review by: Bjorn3d.com
Up to 960GB of storage capacity option, PFMprotection, Low idle power consumption, 5 year warranty, ShieldPlus, SSD Guru is easy to use and visually pleasing, Good price to performance ratio, Up to 960GB of storage capacity option, PFMprotection, Low idle
Performance is not as fast as the competitors, Lacking eDrive and Opal support, Indilinx Barefoot 3 controller is starting to show its age, Performance is not as fast as the competitors, Lacking eDrive and Opal support, Indilinx Barefoot 3 controller is s
The OCZ Vector 180 is probably not the most exciting drive to review as there is not much new technologies added to the drive. Since the drive still uses the same Indilinx Barefoot 3 controller, its performance largely mimics other Indilinx Barefoot 3 dri...
Lack of Support for DevSleep, TCG Opal and eDrive,
Whenever we're called to test a new SSD model we have to take into consideration many factors in our conclusion such as maximum read & write performance (MB/s and IOPS), sustained performance levels, endurance, supported features, warranty...
Published: 2015-06-14, Author: George , review by: hitechlegion.com
Outstanding Mixed Workload Performance, No Loss In Performance With Incompressible Data, Minimal Performance Drop Off as Drive Fills, PFMPower Loss Protection Prevents Data Loss And Drive Failure, Rated for 50GB/Day of Host Writes for 5Years, MTBF 2,300,0
Barefoot 3 Showing Its Age, With Performance Becoming Somewhat Pedestrian
After showing off their new JetExpress controller, and people's attention turning to M.2, OCZ has come through with an unexpected tweak to their Barefoot 3 controlled Vector series. While the changes are not monumental, they are significant and may give...
Well at the end of the day the OCZ Vector 180 is an interesting drive. Given the performance I have seen with older OCZ drives I went into this with high expectations. Sadly in a lot of the synthetic benchmarks the numbers weren't what I was expecting...
Available in 120GB, 240GB, 480GB and 960GB capacities, Endurance rated at 50GB/day for 5 years, Good sequential and random read and write performance, Performs equally well with compressible and incompressible data, SATA 6Gb/s interface, Toggle Mode MLC N
Random write performance at low queue depths could be better, Does not support DEVSLP, Does not support TCG Opal or eDrive encryption
Like OCZ's previous Vector series SSDs, the Vector 180 is a great choice for the gamer or enthusiast looking for a drive that provides exceptional performance, endurance, and reliability. Designed to power today's high-end consumer systems, the Vector 180...
Published: 2015-05-20, Author: Mark , review by: skratchwizpc.net
The OCZ Vector 180 SSD promises to deliver enthusiast class performance and it does just that. Throughout our testing read and write speeds were consistent even though it was slightly behind the HyperX Savage, but only slightly. As for the drive itself...
