id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Nikon AF-S VR 200-400mm f/4.0G IF-ED Zoom-Nikkor



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Nikon AF-S VR 200-400mm f/4.0G IF-ED Zoom-Nikkor

Testseek.com have collected 7 expert reviews of the Nikon AF-S VR 200-400mm f/4.0G IF-ED Zoom-Nikkor and the average rating is 100%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon AF-S VR 200-400mm f/4.0G IF-ED Zoom-Nikkor.
 
(100%)
7 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
100 0 100 7

 

Reviews

page 1 of 1
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-02-10, review by: brighthub.com

  • Abstract:  The constant f/4 aperture will give you greater flexibility at shooting in low light, and the build quality ensures sharply focused high resolution images. If you enjoy wildlife photography, and you can live with the weight, this lens was made..

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2009-02-15, review by: bythom.com

  • Abstract:  Nikkor 200-400mm f/4 EDIF AF-S VRThe review that took seven years Lens Formula 24 elements in 17 groups, with 4 ED elements.Other Features manual/autofocus switch, internal focus, 52mm drop-in filter size. VR (both active and normal), rubber seals, set...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, Author: Michael , review by: imagepower.de

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-09-02, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Abgeblendet bedeutet jedoch Blende 16 bei sichtbarem Randabfall. Der kleine Konverter verhält sich etwas günsti-ger, kann aber auch bei der längsten Brennweite nur abgeblendet halbwegs überzeugen. Beide Kombinationen bringen den Fotografen nicht wirkl...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-10-09, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  In diesem Fall ein Spezialobjektiv für satte 6500 Euro und drei Kilo Gewicht inklusive Bildstabilisator. Bei den kürzeren Brennweiten ist die Qualität exzellent auch bei offener Blende bis in die Ecken. Dagegen erreicht das Telezoom bei 400 Millimete...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2008-09-14, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Technische Daten und TestergebnisseTechnischen Daten Linsen, Gruppen24 Linsen, 17 GruppÄquivalente KB-Brennweite, AF-Bereich300–600 mm, 2,00-∞ meffektiver Bildwinkel diagonal8–4°Filter (Größe, Typ)52 mm, EinsteckfilterLänge, Durchmesser, Gewicht358 ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-06-28, review by: kamerabild.se

  • Abstract:  Frågan är berättigad eftersom 200-400-zoomen kostar cirka 20 000 kronor mer än Nikons 300/2,8 och är längre och ett steg ljussvagare.– Det är press- och sportfotografer samt professionella naturfotografer som köper objektivet. Hobbyfotograferna köper ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 1  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×