id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Corsair PC3-12800 1600MHz Vengeance Series CMZ



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Corsair PC3-12800 1600MHz Vengeance Series CMZ

Testseek.com have collected 83 expert reviews of the Corsair PC3-12800 1600MHz Vengeance Series CMZ and the average rating is 89%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Corsair PC3-12800 1600MHz Vengeance Series CMZ.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2011
March 2011
 
(89%)
83 Reviews
Users
(94%)
68 Reviews
89 0 100 83

 

Reviews

page 1 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-08-03, Author: HP , review by: relaxedtech.com

  • Sturdy & Durable, Lifetime Warranty, Aluminium Heat Spreaders, Fast, Attractive Design
  • Pricey, May Interfere With Large CPU Coolers, There's a downside to having tall aluminum heat spreaders and that is that it may interfere with large air CPU coolers. The heat spreaders extend almost an inch over the PCB and you have to take this into cons

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2013-04-02, review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  In terms of common Linux desktop workloads when comparing the CSX and Corsair memory kits, the results aren't too interesting for real-world performance. Aside from these quantitative performance results, I have been very happy with the Corsair 1...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-07, review by: HardCOREware.net

  • Abstract:  Since the introduction of Sandy Bridge-E – the first desktop CPU with quad channel memory support, memory makers have been putting together 4-stick memory kits, geared towards these quad channel systems. However, that’s not the only reason to consider...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-21, review by: hitechlegion.com

  • Great priceperformance ratio, Lifetime Warranty, XMP 1.3, Lightweight aluminum heatspreader, Stable XMP profile speed/timings can be used with less than 1.5V, Stable 1866MHz with 9109242T, Can be lowered to CL7 timings at 1333MHz,
  • Unable to boot at 1600MHz when latency is lowered from stock CL9 even at 1.65V, gold, Discuss this review in our forums
  • While Corsair’s Dominator sits at the top of the RAM performance throne, and the Corsair XMS line lies at the value segment, the Corsair Vengeance is at the sweet-spot in the middle, offering significant value for enthusiast-level performance. These Co...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-11-21, review by: neoseeker.com

  • The truth about quad-channel memory is that like the triple-channel memory sub-system of Nehalem, Sandy Bridge-E is not starved of memory bandwidth. Essentially this means that even while the overall synthetic testing of quad-channel memory is mind-blo...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-10-18, Author: jeremy , review by: legitreviews.com

  • In today’s modern computers, large amounts of RAM are becoming ubiquitous. Due to the cheap price of system RAM, as well as the desktop PC’s ever-growing need for memory, the vast majority of PCs available for purchase at retail outlets are equipped w...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-09-05, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Because integrated GPUs generally employ shared system memory, RAM performance has a significant effect on gaming frame rates. We're testing seven 8 GB DDR3 kits that manufacturers tell us are a perfect match for AMD’s mainstream Llano-based APUs. The ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-08-25, Author: Jared , review by: Overclockersonline.net

  • Good performance, Limited lifetime warranty
  • Poor overclocking

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-04-18, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Although it's the top performer in today’s comparison, Geil’s lack of U.S. availability makes it impossible to include in any value comparison, which obviously requires that we consider a price tag. That leaves Crucial’s middle-of-the-pack Ballstix DDR...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-10, review by: rbmods.com

  • Stable, Cool, Overclocks well, Price
  • None this far
  • Without current test setup we were not able to boost this ram all the way, I have seen several reviews that boost the ram way higher than we did. I personally think we were limited by our AMD setup in this case. The ram stayed cool during our testing ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×