id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(67%)
224 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 224

 

Reviews

page 7 of 23
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-06-06, review by: theregister.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Extreme PC Week Comparing high-end desktop processors that use the latest architecture from AMD and Intel these days, is a bit like comparing apples to walnuts. To pimp up a PC, there is only one company that really offers extreme processing power, an...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-25, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Introducing a new processor architecture takes a colossal effort. AMD's modular Bulldozer design ran into its share of resistance at launch. Can a handful of software updates turn the company's flagship FX-8150 into the powerhouse AMD promised? The fac...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-25, review by: channelpro.co.uk

  • Abstract:  AMD has finally released Bulldozer – find out how well the new FX range performsRating: 2Average: 2 (1 vote) There’s been plenty of confusion surrounding Bulldozer since we first heard about the new CPU microarchitecture back in July 2007 – we were tol...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-29, review by: computeractive.co.uk

  • Architecture design; multipliers are unlocked out of the box,
  • Expensive; performance left us wanting more,
  • Great new architectural design in a processor that doesn't quite live up to its potential - yet ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-26, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  AMD’s FX processor line-up was supposedly designed with efficiency in mind, according to AMD. We're putting this claim to the test, assessing the Bulldozer architecture at a number of different clock rates and comparing the results to Intel's CPUs. AMD...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-09, review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  AMD's latest processors have been launched. The CPUs with Code name Bulldozer, also know as FX-8150 and FX-8120 are the first octa core CPUs which have been introduced to the consumer and enthusiast market. Today we are testing both eight core based Bu...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-09, Author: Christian , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  AMD's latest processors have been launched. The CPUs with Code name Bulldozer, also know as FX-8150 and FX-8120 are the first octa core CPUs which have been introduced to the consumer and enthusiast market. Today we are testing both eight core based Bulld...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-02, review by: itreviews.com

  • Eight cores and loads of clock speed at a reasonable price,
  • Performance is unimpressive, and the power draw is too high.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-27, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  We've already seen AMD's Bulldozer architecture come up short in the performance benchmarks. However, the company also claims it made important improvements to power consumption. Can FX-8150 at least score some points in the energy efficiency departmen...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-25, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Performance in applications makes effective use of multiple cores, Two Turbo modes
  • Power consumption, Performances should be higher compared with competitors' CPUs and AMD's older models
  • Ultimately, the AMD FX-8150 is a good CPU in every field apart from power consumption. AMD has finally climbed back up to the performance levels of Intel, but we were expecting more, as the next generation of Intel CPUs risks leaving AMD trailing behin...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 7 of 23 « Previous   1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 23   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×