id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(67%)
224 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 224

 

Reviews

page 6 of 23
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-09-13, review by: hardocp.com

  • Abstract:  AMD had us and a few others down to its Austin, Texas offices a couple of weeks ago and gave us quite and overclocking show with its new FX processors. We carried our cameras along in hopes to give you a front row seat at the event and hopefully whet your...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-07, review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • After a long, long wait, AMD has finally delivered Bulldozer. We put the higher-end FX-8150 offering through its paces. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(67%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-31, review by: atomicmpc.com.au

  • Too slow for the price, designed for workloads that just don’t exist at the moment....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-31, Author: John , review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • Too slow for the price, designed for workloads that just don't exist at the moment...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(50%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-14, review by: tweaktown.com

  • Nothing annoys me more than the inability to review a product. It doesn't happen very often, especially when we move outside the realm of the product being DOA or it not making it through all our tests. Two products have eluded me over the last twelv...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: tweaktown.com

  • After our through the normal CPU gauntlet of tests, it's clear that at the moment the full potential of Bulldozer just can't be utilized. I think a large problem in regards to the Bulldozer architecture is we just haven't got the applications at th...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2013-07-04, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Late May we published a huge round-up of 45 desktop processors , followed by a review of Intel's fourth generation Core processors . Our readers immediately, and understandably, came with the request for a similar group test of laptop processors. It's a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-28, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  On June 4 Intel is launching its next generation Core processors, also called Haswell. That means it's the perfect opportunity for us to retest all current processors and a number of older ones with a completely new test configuration. It will not only ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-08-09, Author: Christian , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  That is the question, Intel's Core2Duo was very popular back in the days and still is. Furthermore according to Steam's survey half of steam gamers are still using a machine powered by a dual core processor. Fair enough, let's see how the Core2Duo E8400 c...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-07-05, Author: Christian , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  For this week's battle we present the AMD Bulldozer FX-8150 versus the Intel Ivy Bridge Core i7 3770K. Which are both the top high end processors from our two lovely chip makers. This battle will take place under heavy 3D workloads conditions such as Benc...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 6 of 23 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 23   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×