Testseek.com have collected 38 expert reviews of the ThermalTake Water 2.0 Extreme CLW0217 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for ThermalTake Water 2.0 Extreme CLW0217.
(85%)
38 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
At the time of this review the Water 2.0 Extreme can be purchased online for under $130.00 USD which makes it slightly higher in price than the Corsair H100 competition. In all reality though, they are priced about the same if you take advantage of availa...
When we tested the WATER2.0 Pro, we were pleased by the high cooling performance it achieved. When we were installing the WATER2.0 Performer, a less expensive version with a smaller radiator, we were expecting a sensible performance difference. But the WA...
The Thermaltake Water 2.0 Performer takes the all-in-one water cooling solution and delivers with exceptional cooling, ease of install, and excellent build quality. ...
Thermaltake's Water 2.0 Extreme liquid CPU cooler costs £107 from leading UK retailers. Relative to its nearest competitor, the Corsair H100i which costs £90-95 from leading UK retailers, the Thermaltake Water 2.0 Extreme is more expensive. You are having...
Published: 2012-06-22, Author: Simon , review by: techradar.com
Very good performance, Easy to install, Price
Only four washers supplied for eight screws
That most minor of niggles aside, this is an excellent budget water-cooling kit. And as this cheaper water-cooling option plays so well with the latest overclocked chips, then the Water 2.0 Extreme should be something to behold...
Abstract: When building a high-performance gaming computer, many people simply throw some parts together and never touch the BIOS. Clearly since you're reading this you aren't part of the
Abstract: "Level up" has been a term that is very familiar to many of us. We hear it mainly in video games, but also while in the elevator or on the escalator of multi-floored buildings. We also tell ourselves to "level up" indirectly by trying to be better than...