id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Seagate 3.5 inch IronWolf SATA600 ST-VNA / ST-VN Series



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Seagate 3.5 inch IronWolf SATA600 ST-VNA / ST-VN Series

Testseek.com have collected 192 expert reviews of the Seagate 3.5 inch IronWolf SATA600 ST-VNA / ST-VN Series and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Seagate 3.5 inch IronWolf SATA600 ST-VNA / ST-VN Series.
Award: Editor’s Choice January 2018
January 2018
 
(88%)
192 Reviews
Users
(89%)
675 Reviews
88 0 100 192

The editors liked

  • Performanya cukup baik
  • Kapasitas besar dengan harga yang masih tergolong wajar
  • Tersedia fitur untuk menjamin kondisi kesehatan perangkat
  • Performanya sangat baik
  • Harga sesuai kapasitas
  • Tersedia fitur pengelola kesehatan perangkat dna perlindungan data
  • Kapasitas besar
  • Didesain untuk NAS
  • Kinerja kencang
  • Garansi lima tahun

The editors didn't like

  • Beban kerja atau lifecycle yang kurang panjang
  • Beban kerja dan lifecycle kurang lama
  • Harga mahal

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 20
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-02-22, review by: tweaktown.com

  • As we mentioned in the beginning of the review, the 12TB model didn't appear to use anymore power than the 10TB, according to the specifications. Looking at the raw data from my own testing I do see a touch more being used in random read and random write...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(87%)
 
  Published: 2016-10-07, Author: Matt , review by: techradar.com/au/

  • High capacity Great speeds Excels in RAID arrays NASspecific features
  • Expensive Wasted as a standard hard drive Lower capacities are slower
  • If you're looking for a high capacity hard drive to work hard in a busy NAS setup, you won't find a better drive than this...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2016-09-28, review by: tweaktown.com

  • The IronWolf in its 10TB configuration brings a solid jump in capacity over previous 8TB NAS solutions. For those running multiple bay configurations, this means an extra 4TB for two bay users and 8TB for four bay users. A high-level of build quality is...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2016-08-31, Author: Ben , review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • "It's nice to have a capacity as large as this in a hard drive offering such impressive NAS performance."...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2016-08-31, Author: Ben , review by: pcpowerplay.com.au

  • Decent pricing and very decent performance for all your billions of files.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2016-05-27, Author: Nick , review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Low cost per GB, Huge capacity, Standard 3.5-inch drive, Good warranty, Good NAS optimisations
  • High retail price, Not ideal as boot device
  • SSDs can't compete with price-per-GB-value of this magnitude. A great storage choice...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2018-04-11, Author: Tomas , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Despite the fact that there are only three hard disk drive manufacturers left, you have a lot to choose from when you're looking for a new drive. It is not just about prices either. Though SSDs have outperformed hard drives for a long time now, there are...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-02-25, Author: Chris , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • The Seagate IronWolf and Western Digital Red fight for the same group of customers. Those are mainly people who use small-to-medium size NAS with one to eight bays. That market spans several types of users, from the digital hoarder at home to a small prof...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-22, Author: Farzin , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Because the throughput of these hard drives will be limited by the used NAS and the network connection we do not primarily look at the speed here, but at the elements that are important for this segment: noise levels and power consumption. Therefore it is...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-22, Author: Farzin , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Because the throughput of these hard drives will be limited by the used NAS and the network connection we do not primarily look at the speed here, but at the elements that are important for this segment: noise levels and power consumption. Therefore it is...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 4 of 20 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 20   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×