id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » OCZ 2.5 inch Agility 3 Series SATA600



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of OCZ 2.5 inch Agility 3 Series SATA600

Testseek.com have collected 130 expert reviews of the OCZ 2.5 inch Agility 3 Series SATA600 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for OCZ 2.5 inch Agility 3 Series SATA600.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2011
June 2011
 
(80%)
130 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
80 0 100 130

The editors liked

  • Harga diposisikan lebih terjangkau dari Vertex 3
  • SandForce 2
  • SATA III
  • Kinerja sangat tinggi di kondisi tertentu

The editors didn't like

  • ONFi 1.0 asynchronous dengan kinerja lebih rendah
  • TRIM belum optimal.

 

Reviews

page 6 of 13
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-06-27, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  With the Agility 3, OCZ has a Solid State Drive in its portfolio which is based on the latest SandForce SF-2200 series SSD processor. The drive also features SATA-III support and OCZ claims that the drive can reach throughput rates of more than 500 MByte....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-06-22, review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • When OCZ set out to create the Agility 3 they clearly felt that there was a gap in the market at a price level which the Vertex 3 couldn't currently meet. Thankfully in creating the product to fill that space OCZ haven't gone down the route of cutting ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-26, review by: kitguru.net

  • fantastic performance, IOPS performance is still strong, price point is extremely competitive, between £90£100 less than 240GB Vertex 3, 60GB version in this family will have a tempting price to performance ratio,
  • a Stunning drive, with huge storage capacity for under £400. Well worth a shortlist....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-09-14, review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Let’s begin this conclusion by saying that ONFI 1 drives were never meant to compete head to head against the best this market has to offer. OCZ’s Agility 3 caters to people who want the capacity they’re used to from a hard drive while retaining the br...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-21, review by: aphnetworks.com

  • Abstract:  You know what I don't like about hot weather? Well, it has got to be the heat. (No kidding, right?) And with all the heat, sometimes it is just a bit hard to get my brain working correctly, and a working brain is very important if I want to write a goo...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-02-25, review by: vr-zone.com

  • After thoroughly testing and working with the Agility 3 240GB drive, as well as taking into account its street retail price, we can confidently say that the drive certainly falls into the “mainstream performance” category which OCZ planned it to. Despi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-08-08, review by: vr-zone.com

  • The impact of using cheaper asynchronous NAND varies depending on which aspect of performance you examine. This can lead to somewhat worse performance in some situations, whereas in other scenarios the Agility 3 performs nearly as well as the Vertex 3....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2013-05-19, Author: cuLong , review by: tinhte.vn

  • Theo chúng tôi, giữa benchmark và sử dụng thực tế sẽ có những sự khác biệt khá đáng kể, bởi tùy từng cấu hình thử nghiệm khác nhau sẽ cho những kết quả benchmark khác nhau. Nhưng với giá khá rẻ và hiệu năng tạm ổn, khoảng 5 triệu đồng cho bản 120GB, OCZ A...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-02-14, Author: soothepain , review by: coolaler.com

  • Abstract:  自從去年泰國淹水之後,機械式硬碟的價位還真的是水漲船高,雖然現在有下來一點了,不過仍不見早前的菜市場價,所以有不少人轉而採用SSD固態硬碟,雖然容量差很大,但要真的用得上才有用,像一些友人都只拿來文書、上網,也從來沒在抓東西,倒不如給點速度還比較實在一點。60GB或許有那麼點緊繃,但就看怎麼運用了。 或許對於某些人來說60GB真的裝不了什麼東西,現在的軟體龐大,光是裝個Windows 7加上Office可能就吃掉三分之一了,如果您有Intel的Z68平台,大概只需要裝個ISRT就可以兼顧"空間"及"效率"...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-09-22, Author: 羽神翼 , review by: xfastest.com

  • Abstract:  儲存設備介面進化依序如下 RAMAC介面 、MFM 介面 、RFM 介面 、PATA 介面 (IDE) 、SCSI 介面 、SATA 介面 、SAS介面,而較常用於現今一般通電腦介面為早期的PATA俗稱的IDE速度約為8.3 MB/s~133 MB/s和近幾年快速發展SATA速度約為150 MB/s~600 MB/s;往往電腦的速度最慢的地方就是在於儲存裝置,就像一台高速跑車裝了顆限速器一樣,無法發揮整台車子的效能。而近幾年SSD產品的推出和儲存傳輸介面的進化,對於儲存裝置限制了電腦運作...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 6 of 13 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 13   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×