Testseek.com have collected 64 expert reviews of the LG Watch Style and the average rating is 64%. Scroll down and see all reviews for LG Watch Style.
(64%)
64 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
64010064
Reviews
page 3 of 7
Order by:
Score
Published: 2017-02-08, Author: Dan , review by: theverge.com
Abstract: Are you wearing a smartwatch? Not likely. Despite the fact that modern wrist computers have been available for over three years, most people have not found them to be as desirable or necessary as the ubiquitous smartphone. They've gone from being "the nex...
The LG Watch Style is slim and has an Apple-like rotating crown for easier navigation. Its Android Wear 2.0 software is more user-friendly than its predecessor
Its tiny battery doesn't last a full day. There's a limited number of useful apps, no NFC for mobile payments, no speaker, no heart-rate sensor and no GPS
There are better (and longer-lasting) smartwatches available to go with both Android and iPhones...
Was this review helpful?
(60%)
Published: 2017-09-27, Author: Andrew , review by: stuff.tv
Very light and comfortable, Runs Android Wear 2.0
Poor battery life, Very limited features, No GPS or heart rate sensor
The LG Watch Style's top feature is that it's very light and slimmer than most smartwatches. It's comfortable too. However, it doesn't do much and the battery life is pretty poor - it's one of the lowest-stamina smartwatches we've tested. With a lot rid...
Subtle and simple design, lightweight, Android Wear 2.0 is fast and responsive, waterproofing, Play Store integration is good
Poor battery life, basic functionality with no thrills, a little toy-like in appearance
The LG Watch Style is a simple but effective smartwatch with good overall performance and a great software experience.That said, it doesn't offer the same premium appeal as others in its field. It lacks thrills in terms of features – especially when compa...
Attractive and slim design, Slick Android Wear 2.0 performance, Bright and sharp display
Weak vibration motor, Average battery life, No NFC
LG Watch Style – Performance and Android Wear 2.0 Inside the LG Watch Style is Qualcomm's wearable-friendly Snapdragon Wear 2100 processor, as seen in the Huawei Watch 2. This is alongside 512MB of RAM, which is shy of the 768MB included in both the Huawe...
The LG Watch Style looks and feels great, and we love Wear 2.0 and the new crown scrolling, but beyond that it's just too limited given the price. Without NFC, GPS, 4G, or a heart-rate monitor the Style feels overpriced, and you can get more for less from...
Subtle and simple design, Lightweight, Android Wear 2.0 is fast and responsive, Waterproofing, Play Store integration is good
Poor battery life, Basic functionality with no thrills, A little toy-like in appearance
The LG Watch Style is simple, sophisticated smartwatch that's great for showing off Android Wear 2.0.It offers a much smarter and more feminine design to its more rugged brother, as well as interchangeable straps, though it does miss out in several useful...
Published: 2017-02-17, Author: Dan , review by: CNET.co.uk
The LG Watch Style is slim and has an Apple-like rotating crown for easier navigation. Its Android Wear 2.0 software is more user-friendly than its predecessor
Its tiny battery doesn't last a full day. There's a limited number of useful apps, no NFC for mobile payments, no speaker, no heart-rate sensor and no GPS
There are better (and longer-lasting) smartwatches available to go with both Android and iPhones...
Was this review helpful?
(60%)
Published: 2017-02-08, Author: Michael , review by: wareable.com
Slim, minimalist design, Great addition of rotating crown, Sharp, vibrant display
No NFC for Android Pay, Battery life is not great, Sluggish performance,
The LG Watch Style puts the emphasis on looks over features and from that perspective it does deliver. This is one of the best looking Android Wear watches out there, but the slender form comes at an expense of features that could have made this smartwatc...
