id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Intel Core i7 4960X Extreme Edition 3.6GHz Socket 2011



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i7 4960X Extreme Edition 3.6GHz Socket 2011

Testseek.com have collected 175 expert reviews of the Intel Core i7 4960X Extreme Edition 3.6GHz Socket 2011 and the average rating is 78%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i7 4960X Extreme Edition 3.6GHz Socket 2011.
Award: Most Awarded April 2015
April 2015
 
(78%)
175 Reviews
Users
(97%)
392 Reviews
78 0 100 175

 

Reviews

page 4 of 18
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-09-03, Author: Bruno , review by: reviewstudio.net

  • Cons
  • Intel released a new i7 family for the LGA2011 platform, bringing the Ivy Bridge-E into the market. The three new CPUs come with some improvements over the old series.The i7-4960X offers a 9% increase in frequency over the i7-3960X, and gains an average o...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(88%)
 
  Published: 2013-09-03, review by: techspot.com

  • Slight performance bump and better efficiency for the same price. DDR31866 and PCI Express 3.0 support.
  • Ancient, featureless platform not worthy of extreme/enthusiastlevel CPU. Small jump on features and performance.
  • Those of you looking out for the overclocking section of this review will have noticed there wasn't one. Admitedly there was a narrow time frame to get this review complete by the launch date, however when we tried to overclock the i7-4960X we had very li...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2013-09-03, review by: overclock3d.net

  • As we said at the start, the LGA2011 range so far hasn't been the biggest success Intel have ever had. It's too expensive for the amount of performance that the average user will require. However, if you need extraordinary amounts of power for rendering...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2013-09-02, review by: rwlabs.com

  • Ivy Bridge E is in many ways the same old same old we have seen from Intel over the last few launches. Ultimately we can chalk this up to a lack of competition from AMD, so what we get is a good processor that is only slightly better than the previous...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-09-02, Author: Chris , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Does Intel's Core i7-4960X, specifically, get me all revved up about upgrading? Well, no. Not really. But then again, those thousand-dollar CPUs rarely do. What about the Core i7-4930K replacing Intel's -3930K for $550? That'd be a tough sell for all of t...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-08-31, review by: hardocp.com

  • The general feeling I come away from the Ivy Bridge-E is that it is a good processor, but nothing stellar when compared to the Sandy Bridge-E predecessor. Is it better? Yes. It is a whole lot better? No. Should you ditch your Sandy Bridge-E system for a s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-08-30, review by: hardocp.com

  • The general feeling I come away from the Ivy Bridge-E is that it is a good processor, but nothing stellar when compared to the Sandy Bridge-E predecessor. Is it better? Yes. It is a whole lot better? No. Should you ditch your Sandy Bridge-E system for a s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-08-30, review by: hardocp.com

  • The general feeling I come away from the Ivy Bridge-E is that it is a good processor, but nothing stellar when compared to the Sandy Bridge-E predecessor. Is it better? Yes. It is a whole lot better? No. Should you ditch your Sandy Bridge-E system for a s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-31, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Abstract:  Let's show the basic specs of all Core i7 processors released to date in a series of quick-reference tables. The Core i7 was the first Intel processor to bring an integrated memory controller, feature available on AMD processors since the Athlon 64. In...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-14, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  That the fastest processors are currently made by Intel is not really a secret, but what is the best choice when you want to spend up to £ 50, £100 or £150? To answer that question we conducted a megatest of 57 current AMD and Intel CPUs. From two to...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 18 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×