id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Intel Core i3 2100T 2.5Ghz Socket 1155



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i3 2100T 2.5Ghz Socket 1155

Testseek.com have collected 101 expert reviews of the Intel Core i3 2100T 2.5Ghz Socket 1155 and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i3 2100T 2.5Ghz Socket 1155.
Award: Most Awarded April 2011
April 2011
 
(81%)
101 Reviews
Users
(93%)
779 Reviews
81 0 100 101

 

Reviews

page 3 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-01-02, review by: legitreviews.com

  • Abstract:  It seems just like yesterday that Intel launched the Core 2 Duo series of CPUs and re-established itself as the king of the hill for x86 CPUs. As hard as it may be to believe, that was four and a half years ago. Since then Intel has been following ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-08-08, review by: itnews.com.au

  • Abstract:  A brand-new core design enables the chips to do more at a given clock speed than their predecessors. The humble Core i3-2120 runs at a slightly slower 3.3GHz frequency than the mid-range i5-660 from Intel's older 1156 platform, but it achieved higher benc...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2012-07-02, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  We update our first look at AMD's A6, A8, and A8 Trinity-based APUs with numbers from an A8-3870K, Core i3-2100, and Core i3-2105. The new results give us a much better idea of how the upcoming architecture will fare in productivity apps and games. Sho...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-02-23, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Following our sub-£160 gaming CPU comparison, we put Intel's Core i3-2100 and AMD's FX-4100 under the microscope. This time, we test a number of different graphics cards from AMD to see how GPUs affect perceived processor bottlenecks. At the end of Jan...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-02-03, review by: channelpro.co.uk

  • Despite the lack of Turbo Boost, the i3-2100 was able to hold its own in many of our benchmarks, giving CPUs such as the LGA1366 Core i7-950 and quad-core Core i5-2400 something to think about. Most inspiring of all was its speed in games and image edi...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-04-19, review by: techradar.com

  • GPU overclocking, Price
  • No CPU overclocking, Gaming performance
  • Low end system builders may love it, but whether the home user will build a system around it is a bit doubtful...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-04-04, review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • Abstract:  There were two stand out aspects to the processors though. The first one was performance on offer from the i3-2100 for £90/$125. That CPU kept pace with the quad core model in a number of tests and really does offer a great..

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-03-01, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Today we're putting the latest sub-$200 CPUs into a cage match armed with nothing but the latest DirectX 11 games (plus a helping of StarCraft 2) to see how they fare. Can AMD's familiar Athlons and Phenoms stand up to the new Sandy Bridge-based CPUs? ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Although the processing cores in Intel’s Sandy Bridge architecture are decidedly similar to Nehalem, the integration of on-die graphics and a ring bus improves performance for mainstream users. Intel’s Quick Sync is this design’s secret weapon, though....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Good performance overall, Hyperthreading, Energy consumption, Integrated graphics useful for an office PC, Integrated graphics support stereoscopic 3D and hardware acceleration
  • No Turbo mode, Faster CPUs are available, Graphics not good enough for regular gamers
  • Intel has produced a well-rounded CPU that can handle most jobs, including video games. You can certainly get a better processor—but you'll be paying more for it, too....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 3 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×