id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.0GHz Socket 775



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.0GHz Socket 775

Testseek.com have collected 84 expert reviews of the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.0GHz Socket 775 and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.0GHz Socket 775.
Award: Most Awarded January 2008
January 2008
 
(83%)
84 Reviews
Users
(90%)
115 Reviews
83 0 100 84

 

Reviews

page 5 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-11-14, review by: custompc.co.uk

  • If the Penryn architecture only yielded an average performance increase of 6 per cent over the Core architecture, this alone would be considered a good step forward for Intel on this tricky new manufacturing process. However, the Penryn architecture ha...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(88%)
 
  Published: 2007-10-31, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • For the moment, most users would gain little advantage in upgrading to a Penryn CPU - the chip may not be compatible with your PCs motherboard, the market has few SSE4-optimised applications that would allow it to shine performance-wise, and it will ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2007-10-29, review by: HEXUS.net

  • utterly predictably, the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 takes the mantle of worlds greatest desktop processor - bumping the incumbent QX6850 aside and sitting magisterially on the performance throne. Phenom X4, whachya got? HEXUS.awards Intel Core 2 Ext...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2007-10-29, review by: zdnet.co.uk

  • Fastest highend desktop chip on the market, New specialised instructions should further improve performance with supporting software
  • Expensive, New chips due from AMD are an unknown factor, More complete Intel architecture redesign is only a year away
  • The CPU market is due for a lot of upheaval over the next 12 months, so you might be wise to wait for a clearer picture before plunking down $1000 or so on Intels new Core 2 Extreme QX9650 quad-core desktop processor. But if you want to claim ownersh

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2007-10-29, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Rarely have things looked as good for Intel as they do right now. Exactly 18 months after their introduction, Intel is updating its highly successful Core 2 CPUs. The chipmaker is shrinking the structures from 65 nm to 45 nm and is already preparing t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: theregister.co.uk

  • Penryn is a step forward from Kentsfield that offers moderately better performance in day-to-day tasks but when you give it a sniff of SSE 4 it shows a distinct benefit. The much-reduced power draw is very encouraging too. You’d be crazy to spend £6...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-06-01, review by: aphnetworks.com

  • Abstract:  Last week, we took a look at the so-called "budget minded" Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 desktop processor. Okay, it may be slapped with the budget tag, but it certainly isnt budget performance -- our benchmarks indicate that it performed on an average of ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2007-11-25, review by: overclockersclub.com

  • 45mn Technology, 12MB L2 Cache, QuadCore, 3.0 GHZ, SSE4...
  • May not be affordable for some...
  • the Intel Core 2 quad-core QX9650 performs. To date it has produced the highest scores out of any processor I have used or reviewed. I like the fact that even overclocked and on air cooling, my CPU temperatures did not go above 49 degrees Celsius at ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2008-02-01, Author: Saurangshu , review by: pcquest.com

  • Abstract:  This is the first Quad core processor that Intel launched for desktops and is based on 45nm technology. It basically has two dual-core CPUs paired on a single silicon package, with shared bus interface running at 1333 MHz. Each die has up to 6 MB of L2 ca...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-10-29, review by: ocworkbench.com

  • SSE4, 45nm, Low temperatures
  • Too costly
  • In terms of raw performance, this CPU is slightly faster than a QX6700 o/c to same clock speed. This is largely due to a bigger amount of cache. When overclock is concerned, the CPU is able to overclock to 4GHz on air easily. Although we can go higher...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
    page 5 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×