id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

Testseek.com have collected 21 expert reviews of the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM and the average rating is 70%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM.
 
(70%)
21 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
70 0 100 21

 

Reviews

page 2 of 3
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2008-04-30, review by: juzaphoto.com

  • Very versatile zoom range, ideal for wildlife, It is light and small enough be be carried everywhere, and it is easy to handhold, Excellent autofocus, Good image quality between 100 and 300mm, Minimum focussing distance of just 1.8 and macro rati...
  • Slight softness and harsh bokeh at 400mm

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-09-01, review by: The-digital-picture.com

  • Abstract:  The Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM Lens has an excellent focal length range. To get the excellent focal length zoom range, does something have to be given up? Sharpness was not sacrificed on any of the copies I have owned. Although not as shar...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: luminous-landscape.com

  • Abstract:  Canon 100~400mm f/4.5-f/5.6L IS ZoomVersusCanon 70~200mm f/2.8L IS ZoomWith Canon 2X Extender A Shoot-Out Hows that for a title? Its almost as big as the comparison test itself. Heres what the test is all about: A comparison of Canons 100~400mm IS...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: bobatkins.com

  • Abstract:  This lens is currently Canons only L series telephoto zoom with IS (Image Stabilization). It competes with the 400/5.6L (no zoom, no IS), the 300/4L IS (no zoom), the 100-300/5.6L (no IS), the 35-350/4-5.6L (no IS) and the 75-300/4-5.6 IS (not "L" ser...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-12, Author: 梁爽 , review by: xitek.com

  • Abstract:  我用EOS记录我的世界,一镜一世界。数码摄影时代带给人们的是即时成像技术,所见即所得,简化了过去复杂的那些程序,也少了很多期待的乐趣。现在基本上都用佳能的EOS系列相机和镜头。目前最常用的相机 :EOS 5D MarkIII目前最常用的镜头 :24L、35L,旅游带着28-300L。曾经使用过的部分器材感悟 :(镜头的使用感受都是指在全画幅相机上)有了定焦镜头,24-70L和70-200L就开始闲置,虽然也是非常好的镜头,但旅游携带不方便,每次旅游外出,一般两支镜头都要带着,频繁换镜头成了旅游中不可避免的...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-12-24, review by: cameranonaniwa.co.jp

  • Abstract:  こんにちは、キヤノンユーザーのカメラ担当 池田です。今回ご紹介するレンズは、私が今一番欲しいレンズと言っても過言ではないEF100-400/4.5-5.6L IS Ⅱです。前モデルより大幅にリニューアルされ、2014年12月19日に発売されました。実に16年ぶりのリニューアルです。その大幅にリニューアル、改善された主な点ですが・・・①手ブレ補正効果が2段から4段にアップ。②直進ズームから快適に操作できる回転式ズームに変更。③最短撮影距離が1.8mから0.98mに短縮。最大撮影倍率は0.31倍。④防塵・防滴...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-09-26, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Im Tele verschlechtert sich allerdings bei Blende 11 die Bildmitte durch Beugung und verliert an Kontrast. Insgesamt bleibt das 100-400er Canon aber an der 7D empfehlenswert.www.canon.de Technische Daten und TestergebnisseTechnische Daten Linsen, G...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2010-09-02, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Allerdings ist die Kombination dieses Zooms mit einem Konverter nur in Ausnahme­fällen praktikabel: Wer den 2x-Konverter bei 400 mm einsetzt, senkt die Lichtstärke auf Blende 11. Der Autofokus arbeitet nun nicht mehr, weil zu wenig Licht vorhanden ist,...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-09-02, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Allerdings ist die Kombination dieses Zooms mit einem Konverter nur in Ausnahme­fällen praktikabel: Wer den 2x-Konverter bei 400 mm einsetzt, senkt die Lichtstärke auf Blende 11. Der Autofokus arbeitet nun nicht mehr, weil zu wenig Licht vorhanden ist,...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-10-09, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Ein richtiges Fernrohr (1450 Euro) mit mittlerer Lichtstärke, aber mit solider Qualität bereits bei offener Blende. Nur bei den langen Brennweiten treten Farbsäume auf, die sich erst beim Abblenden verringern. 400 mm Brennweite und Blende 11 – das wir...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 2 of 3 « Previous   1 2 3   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×