Testseek.com have collected 44 expert reviews of the Battlefield: Bad Company and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Battlefield: Bad Company.
June 2008
(82%)
44 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Abstract: However, it seems EA were intent on tarnishing the experience for you. What could have been the perfect game has been hindered on achieving that status not due to the gameplay itself. No, that would make scoring the game too easy. The challenge EA ha...
Abstract: There have been enough war-themed shooters in recent years to stretch to the moon and back, so its hard to raise enthusiasm for yet another bullet-riddled sortie. Thankfully Bad Company skirts a minefield of cliche to deliver an exciting and memorabl...
Blowing stuff up has rarely been this fun, Great collection of gadgets and vehicles, Massive 24-player maps, Finally, a fleshed-out single-player game, Excellent balance in player classes, vehicle strength, and map layouts
Some enemies in campaign never graduated basic training, Conquest mode not available at launch, Graphics and textures appear grainy
With its great multiplayer action and fleshed-out single-player campaign, Bad Company really isnt bad at all. ...
So much destruction on offer, great fun in multiplayer, when it works, fantastic audio experience
Some stupid enemies, single-player not as fun as Call of Duty 4, some online multiplayer troubles
A step behind Call of Duty 4, Bad Company doesn’t claim the top spot. But if you’re tired of Soap MacTavish and the gang, then you could do a lot worse than give Bad Company the time of day...
Abstract: The switch back and forth from PC to 360 controller is never easy, but Battlefield: Bad Company certainly incentivises the experience. It even got me wrestling with my AV amp in search of some quality surround sound to match the rest of the game.Usin...
It has destruction, character and ambience by the truckload, but it should have learned to walk before it started running. 7.0/10Print this pageUser reviews (2)Share this pageNoticed something wrong? Report error/mistake....
