Testseek.com have collected 137 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz Socket sTR4.
October 2017
(90%)
137 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
900100137
Reviews
page 2 of 14
Order by:
Score
Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Marco , review by: hothardware.com
Great Multi-Threaded Performance, Massive Amounts Of IO, High Memory Bandwidth, Modern Chipset Support, Unlocked And Tweakable, Disruptive Pricing
Relatively High Power Consumption, Trails Intel In Lightly-Threaded Apps, Still Pricey, Though Better Than Intel
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processors -- Find Them At AmazonWhether it sells in big numbers or not (we think it will), Threadripper is going to be a disruptive product. For creative professionals that need massive amounts of compute performance, Threadripper...
Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com
In this review we've covered several important topics surrounding CPUs with large numbers of cores: power, frequency, and the need to feed the beast. Running a CPU is like the inverse of a diet – you need to put all the data in to get any data out. The mo...
Abstract: It is highly likely that you already know what AMD's Threadripper actually is in terms of specifications given all the recent coverage. Here is a quick chart that will give you the basics that you need to know. While we are not reviewing the Threadripper...
Was this review helpful?
Award
-
Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com
Hopefully you've been paying attention these last many pages, as the launch of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper processor and X399 platform is not a simple read-the-last-page kind of release. From a technology and architecture stand point, what might at first a...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
The Threadripper 1920X offers more performance, uses less power and runs cooler than the Core i97900X. It also supports ECC memory (Intel's X299 platform doesn't). Compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X, the 1920X touts quadchannel memory support and more PCIe lan
The $1,000 Threadripper 1950X is competitively priced but nonetheless comes at a hefty premium. Threadripper falls a tad behind when it comes to gaming
Right then, and that was our 2nd Threadripper review already. For the Threadripper 1920X as tested today you will need to pay 799 USD. So that's 200 bucks off compared to the 1950X model. Honestly, if you go for the X399 + Threadripper combo, you might as...
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Threadripper 1920X are very impressive processors that did extremely well in content creation benchmarks that take advantage of having a 16-core, 32-thread processor in the system. The good news is a good number of app...
Abstract: A Sneak preview on Ryzen Threadripper processors A meet & greet with the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and 1950XSoon the AMD Ryzen Threadripper review will go live, however to fill that gap in time AMD has allowed the media to show some photos of the press-kit...
Abstract: AMD recently announced that their new 16 core / 32 thread Threadripper 1950X CPU will retail for $999, while the 12 core / 24 thread 1920X CPU will come in at $799. These sums seem kingly until you realize that they're meant to compete with Intel's 18 cor...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2017-07-13, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com
Abstract: We already know a lot of about Threadripper, AMD's answer to the X299/X99 high-end desktop platforms from Intel, including that they would be coming this summer, have up to 16-cores and 32-threads of compute, and that they would all include 64 lanes of P...
