Testseek.com have collected 162 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
September 2015
(82%)
162 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Great performance for its size, Arguably preferable to the Fury X
Other cards already accomplish its goal, Expensive, Can't handle 4K in every game
The R9 Nano is a novel idea for a card. It's built on the theory that gamers want a card with high performance in a small package. Whether that's true or not remains to be seen, but either way, the R9 Nano is unlikely to satisfy those in the market for...
Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net
The R9 Nano packs an unprecedented amount of rendering power into an absolutely tiny product, and possesses superb build quality. The background 'buzz' on our sample is a concern, but in terms of the overall cooling assembly, it works very well - the Nano...
A product which pushes boundaries… sometimes too far. Not cheap but for certain consumers who want to work around its issues this will be a product which brings new performance levels to small form factor systems...
Best SFF performance, True innovation, Lots more perf with OC, HBM memory, Looks the business
Clear coil whine on sample, No overclocking on memory, No HDMI 2.0
AMD most likely understands that it won't have clear consumer GPU performance leadership in this round of launches, with the GeForce GTX Titan X and partner-clocked GTX 980 Tis holding a reasonable advantage at a 4K resolution.But winning the hearts...
Enthusiasts fond of space-saving gaming PCs have dreamed of a graphics card that runs as fast as a factory-overclocked Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 at Full HD resolution, and even faster at Ultra HD, while being smaller, lighter and even a bit less power hungry...
AMD's R9 Nano is, at first glance, precariously placed in the market with its $649 MSRP that makes it as expensive as both the Radeon R9 Fury X and GeForce GTX 980 Ti, both of which perform considerably better. However, the price-to-performance perspectiv...
Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Luke , review by: kitguru.net
Brings new levels of performance to the SFF graphics card market, Comfortably outperforms other SFF offerings (GTX 970 and R9 380), Capable of playable 4K performance, Cooling solution keeps the GPU temperatures in line, Cooling solution is not loud enoug
Retail price is significantly above its closest performance competitor (the GTX 980), Cooler design exhausts some air directly into the chassis, Rear components can get hot and there is no backplate, No native HDMI 2.0
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is a unique graphics card in many ways. It utilises a flagship GPU but houses it on a board which measures in at six inches long to make it a true mITX graphics card.As far as small form factor graphics cards go, AMD has comfortably...
Abstract: When the R9 Nano was first launched we determined it was a great little card , albeit one that would only appeal to a very narrow subset of users. It was admittedly geared towards small form factor systems but that also meant it competed against every oth...
I initially had my doubts about the R9 Nano. After AMD’s preview the consensus on our forums and throughout the tech community was that it was far too expensive, didn’t offer enough performance (based on initially vague estimates) and targeted a niche tha...
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano is a godsend piece of hardware for builders of SFF computers, providing performance of high-end graphic cards all in a small package. If you're a SFF enthusiast it's perfect for any kind of build, and even if you're not the R9 Nano...
