id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Radeon R9 280X 3GB GDDR5 PCle



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 280X 3GB GDDR5 PCle

Testseek.com have collected 198 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 280X 3GB GDDR5 PCle and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 280X 3GB GDDR5 PCle.
Award: Editor’s Choice May 2015
May 2015
 
(85%)
198 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
85 0 100 198

 

Reviews

page 5 of 20
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-10-08, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Last week AMD unveiled its new series of graphics cards. We tested the first batch of new cards, consisting of the R7 260X, R9 270X and R9 280X. In this review you'll find all benchmark results, frametimes and – for the faster cards - EyeFinity benchmar...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-10-08, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • Abstract:  ex Tax)After what feels like a very long wait, AMD's new Volcanic Islands graphics cards are finally here... sort of. Although AMD unveiled a full lineup of 10 days ago, the top of the range Radeon R9 290X and R9 290 are sadly yet to arrive, and ind...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(72%)
 
  Published: 2014-01-14, Author: Sahil , review by: illgaming.in

  • OK. So now that we have all our numbers, lets talk about the performance first. The R9 280X version we tested was an ASUS DirectIICU 280X TOP model. Performance wise, the 280X performed slightly better than the GTX 770 in most cases, with it being trumped...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-06-30, Author: thesea , review by: expreview.com

  • 因此在最后的结尾部分,首先我们要肯定是的是,R9 280X显卡在大多数项目的后发提升幅度是高于对手GTX 770的。但是对于负优化本身,我们又可以得出这样一个结论,如果把负优化的标准设定为显卡在经过驱动版本的改变之后出现性能下降的情况,从我们的测试中是没有发现可以支撑该理论的证据的,虽然不同的驱动中的性能有浮动(注意只是波动而不是下降),但总的趋势都是提高和优化,仅仅是提高的多与少而已。如果具体说明的话,双方都没有看到可以作为证据的负优化表现,GTX 770在性能的后期提升方面不及R9 280X亮眼,但是...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-30, Author: Axe斧娃 , review by: expreview.com

  • 因此在最后的结尾部分,首先我们要肯定是的是,R9 280X显卡在大多数项目的后发提升幅度是高于对手GTX 770的。但是对于负优化本身,我们又可以得出这样一个结论,如果把负优化的标准设定为显卡在经过驱动版本的改变之后出现性能下降的情况,从我们的测试中是没有发现可以支撑该理论的证据的,虽然不同的驱动中的性能有浮动(注意只是波动而不是下降),但总的趋势都是提高和优化,仅仅是提高的多与少而已。如果具体说明的话,双方都没有看到可以作为证据的负优化表现,GTX 770在性能的后期提升方面不及R9 280X亮眼,但是...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-07-04, Author: 洪詩詩 , review by: techbang.com

  • Abstract:  Titanfall肯定在那名單內。先前遊戲開放公開測試(已結束),俄國網站GameGPU選了30張主流顯卡,測試這款仍使用Source引擎的年度大作。測試結果讓人驚訝,老邁的Source引擎表現依然出色,而且UHD下比想像中還要吃資源...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-01-18, Author: Axiang , review by: techbang.com

  • Abstract:  要找2014年遊戲大作,Titanfall肯定在那名單內。先前遊戲開放公開測試(已結束),俄國網站GameGPU選了30張主流顯卡,測試這款仍使用Source引擎的年度大作。測試結果讓人驚訝,老邁的Source引擎表現依然出色,而且UHD下比想像中還要吃資源。談到測試之前,先來看看這款遊戲的引擎以及影像表現...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-02-17, Author: tandee , review by: techbang.com

  • Abstract:  要找2014年遊戲大作,Titanfall肯定在那名單內。先前遊戲開放公開測試(已結束),俄國網站GameGPU選了30張主流顯卡,測試這款仍使用Source引擎的年度大作。測試結果讓人驚訝,老邁的Source引擎表現依然出色,而且UHD下比想像中還要吃資源。談到測試之前,先來看看這款遊戲的引擎以及影像表現。Source引擎是由Valve所開發,最初亮相於2004年的Counter-Strike: Source與顫慄時空2,後續應用於傳送門(Portal)、傳送門2(Portal 2)、絕地要塞(Team...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-10-13, Author: Nongkoo , review by: vmodtech.com

  • ก็มาถึงบทสรุปครับกับการทดสอบ AMD RADEON R9 280X Crossfire Performance Review ที่วันนี้จัดทั้งแบบเดิมๆและโอเวอร์คล๊อกกันแบบเต็มๆเทียบเคียงประสิทธิภาพกัน เราจะเห็นได้ว่าผลทดสอบที่ออกมานั้นแรงมากครับกับการทำงานของการ์ดสองใบจะมีบางโปรแกรมและบางเกมส์ที่ยังไม่ร...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2013-10-08, review by: hispazone.com

  • De momento tendremos que esperar para ver por un lado una de las prestaciones que veo más interesantes, como es TrueAudio, y por otro lado tendremos que ver el verdadero potencial de la nueva arquitectura de AMD con sus modelos de gama más alta. Mode...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 20 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 20   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×