id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Phenom 2 X4 955 Black Edition 3.2GHz Socket AM3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Phenom 2 X4 955 Black Edition 3.2GHz Socket AM3

Testseek.com have collected 138 expert reviews of the AMD Phenom 2 X4 955 Black Edition 3.2GHz Socket AM3 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Phenom 2 X4 955 Black Edition 3.2GHz Socket AM3.
Award: Most Awarded April 2009
April 2009
 
(84%)
138 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
84 0 100 138

 

Reviews

page 5 of 14
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2009-04-01, review by: computershopper.com

  • Good performance for the price; has overclocking headroom; uses inexpensive motherboards; supports both DDR2 and DDR3 RAM
  • In most tests, displayed lesser performance than the slowest Intel Core i7 chip; existing AM2+ motherboards may need a BIOS upgrade
  • AMD gives its high-end Phenom II X4 processor a speed boost, but the supporting utilities are even more interesting than the hardware. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(82%)
 
  Published: 2009-08-07, Author: Cameron , review by: tweaktown.com

  • Phenom II is growing in numbers with AMD still having no end in sight for the K10 architecture. While Phenom II is not the juggernaut that the market had really hoped for, K10 does have its place as an alternative to a high priced Intel processor. Q...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(91%)
 
  Published: 2009-07-24, review by: Zdnet.com.au

  • Great performance, Good value proposition, Unlocked multiplier
  • Multimedia performance suffers compared to Intel
  • While the higher power consumption is a slight concern, the X4 955 proves that AMD is back in the performance game and ready to play hard ball. Bring on the next generation.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2009-07-24, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Great performance , Good value proposition , Unlocked multiplier
  • Multimedia performance suffers compared to Intel
  • While the higher power consumption is a slight concern, the X4 955 proves that AMD is back in the performance game and ready to play hard ball. Bring on the next generation....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2009-05-01, review by: impulsegamer.com

  • Abstract:  Joel Williams9.2The battle between AMD versus Intel has reached the next level with AMDs latest Phenom II CPUs just hitting the market which promises additional power for not only general PC users but also those seeking the Dragon Platform. For thos...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(92%)
 
  Published: 2009-04-24, review by: atomicmpc.com.au

  • Abstract:  AMDs series of Phenom II processors have been some of the most interesting - and finicky - processors of the past few years. With what is essentially a very tweaked K8 architecture, there dont seem to be many changes on the surface; its only when yo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(77%)
 
  Published: 2011-03-01, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Today we're putting the latest sub-$200 CPUs into a cage match armed with nothing but the latest DirectX 11 games (plus a helping of StarCraft 2) to see how they fare. Can AMD's familiar Athlons and Phenoms stand up to the new Sandy Bridge-based CPUs? ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-08-17, review by: XSreviews.co.uk

  • With the Phenom II X4 955 BE only recently eclipsed by the 965 BE in terms of raw speed, the former is still a very impressive CPU that should be able to compete well with Intel’s quad core range. The overclocking, with air cooling, is still somewha...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2009-06-23, review by: tech-reviews.co.uk

  • In short the AMD Phenom 955 is a solid all-round performer with the raw power and speed to get AMD fan boys shouting. It is a disappointment though that this is AMD’s best answer at current to Intel’s market dominance, and now that the core i7...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2009-06-17, review by: techradar.com

  • A few more MHz is never a bad thing, Improved overclocking at stock voltages
  • Less impressive at higher voltages, Pricey compared to the existing 940 chip

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 5 of 14 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×