id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 266 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Award: Most Awarded July 2015
July 2015
 
(79%)
266 Reviews
Users
(93%)
2719 Reviews
79 0 100 266

The editors liked

  • Masih menggunakan socket AMD AM3
  • Performa lebih kencang dibandingkan AMD FX generasi sebelumnya
  • Untuk kelas highend
  • Harga yang ditawarkan cukup terjangkau
  • Jakarta
  • CHIP.co.id Untuk mengobati kekecewaan dari para pengguna AMD Bulldozer
  • Kini AMD kembal

The editors didn't like


Show Show

 

Reviews

page 7 of 27
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-11-30, review by: itreviews.com

  • The AMD FX-8350 CPU improves company's standing against Intel but doesn't rewrite the rules of the game....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2012-11-28, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Earlier this month we looked at the gaming performance in Windows 8 compared to Windows 7 , and it turns out there was no difference. Afterwards our loyal readers asked us to apply our expertise to the processor performance in Windows 8, to find out whe...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-11-08, Author: Dave , review by: techradar.com

  • Good stable overclock, Great multi, treaded performance, Good value for money
  • Single, threaded performance not great

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-29, review by: vortez.net

  • Definite clock for clock improvement over Bulldozer, Increased clock speeds whilst keeping the same TDP, Competes against the Intel Core i5 3570K in lots of tasks, Good performance for the money
  • High power consumption is still an issue, Single threaded performance still needs improvement, 32nm technology, Intel are on 22nm
  • AMD have certainly raised the game with the revised version of Bulldozer, known now as Piledriver. However, we have not seen the quoted 'up to 23%' improvement which AMD said there should be. Obviously, that is in an ideal world it may be that big of ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Abstract:  It is just over a year since AMD launched its flagship consumer CPU. Probably known to you as 'Bulldozer' and brought to market under the performance-intimating FX branding, AMD's grounds-up design, comprised of up to eight cores, generally failed to win ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, Author: Chris , review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Amazing for serious multitasking, but eight cores is still too many for most applications...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, Author: Stuart , review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • Just over a year on from the original FX launch where does the FX-8350 leave us? Well looking at the build quality first we have a chip which shares the same good level of manufacturing as previous CPUs. These are resilient chips and cope well with plenty...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Last year, AMD launched its Bulldozer architecture to disappointed enthusiasts who were hoping to see the company rise to its former glory. Today, we get an FX processor based on the Piledriver update. Does it give power users something to celebrate? A...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, review by: eteknix.com

  • This year has primarily been about Intel with their success of Ivy Bridge and the Z77 platform, but we mustn't forget about AMD as they still take a chunk of the market that appeals to the budget conscious who want the very best performance, but can't aff...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-10-23, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  The first generation processors based on AMD's Bulldozer architecture did not meet expectations, so AMD is making a second attempt today, with FX 2.0 or Vishera. The Piledriver cores are a refinement and further development of Bulldozer, that are suppos...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 7 of 27 « Previous   1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 27   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×