Testseek.com have collected 76 expert reviews of the AMD A8-7600 65W 3.3GHz Socket FM2+ and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD A8-7600 65W 3.3GHz Socket FM2+.
February 2014
(76%)
76 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Abstract: AGUSTUS tampaknya menjadi momen bagi AMD untuk mengeluarkan produk-produk terbarunya. Diawal bulan ini, perusahaan asal Amerika Serikat itu mengeluarkan kartu grafis tercepat untuk hing performance computing (HPC). Selain itu, tiga prosesor APU juga diper...
Abstract: AMD today introduced the new AMD A10-7800 and A8-7600 Accelerated Processing Units (APU) to the component channel. These processors are part of AMD's 4th Generation of APU's that are code named Kaveri. Kaveri is AMD's first processor that utilizes the Het...
The Kaveri A8-7600 with Radeon R7 on-die graphics is supposed to offer an attractive all-in-one solution for mainstream users. At $119 it is relatively affordable and it makes a lot of sense for casual gamers or home users. Sadly though, the A8-7600 is st...
Much better integrated-graphics performance than comparable Intel chips, CPU performance similar to that of previous-generation A10, while sipping a third less power
Comparably priced Intel Core i3 is faster in most typical CPU workloads, Fast RAM required for best gaming performance, HSA support currently limited
This midrange CPU/GPU delivers very good integrated graphics performance, and improved CPU performance, at a more reasonable price and power level than its A10-7850K "Kaveri" counterpart. It’s a good choice for budget gaming PCs, though comparable In...
Kaveri is another incremental improvement to AMD's mainstream desktop lineup. Efficiency is the watchword, both in terms of CPU clock cycles and power consumption. The A8-7600, despite having a modest clock speed of 3.1 or 3.3 GHz (depend on the TDP s...
Subjective impressions and conclusions As I said on the previous page, Battlefield 4's Mantle renderer is kind of a double-edged sword. That's true on Kaveri much as it is on the high-end, R9 290X-powerd system that Scott tested. The renderer's effect, in...
As the benchmarks have shown, AMD are still way off when it comes to CPU specific tasks. However, Kaveri was never really meant to compete with Intel's i5 or i7 processors and was aimed more at the casual gamer. In terms of gaming performance, Kaveri sho...
Was this review helpful?
(78%)
Published: 2014-01-23, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Kaveri's efficiency gains make it a wise choice over Richland while AMD's powerful integrated graphics and affordable pricing are enough to counter Intel's faster CPUs.
Relatively weak speed gains overall with a 10% clockforclock performance bump over Richland, while the older part actually came out on top more than we expected.
Published: 2014-01-21, Author: Joel , review by: pcmag.com
Best-in-class GPU performance. Much-improved CPU performance. Future support for HSA applications and the Mantle graphics API should further improve performance.
Performance still lags far behind that of Intel chips
The new AMD A8-7600 offers best-in-class GPU performance and much-improved CPU performance in the 45W power envelope. Future support for HSA applications and the Mantle graphics API should further improve the chip's performance....
Published: 2014-01-16, Author: Chris , review by: tomshardware.com
Abstract: We've spent the days following CES benchmarking two of AMD's new Kaveri-based APUs. Do the Steamroller x86 architecture, GCN graphics design, and HSA-oriented features impress, or do they come up short against Intel's value-oriented Haswell-based parts? ...
