id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz Socket FM2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz Socket FM2

Testseek.com have collected 190 expert reviews of the AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz Socket FM2 and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz Socket FM2.
Award: Most Awarded April 2014
April 2014
 
(76%)
190 Reviews
Users
(90%)
292 Reviews
76 0 100 190

 

Reviews

page 5 of 19
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-12-13, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  Should you be thinking about buying a used CPU in the price range of 120 to 150 Euro, then you might be considering to buy either an Intel Core i5-2500K or an AMD A10-6800K. At this point we want to answer the question which of these CPUs would be the bet...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-12-06, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  In the past few years, Intel and AMD have spent a lot of resources in improving the performance of their integrated graphics units. Intel has been working hard to make sure their HD graphics becomes competitive with AMDs Radeon units. Today we're going to...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-11-30, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  In the past few months we tested and compared quite a few Intel CPUs regarding gaming performance. Therefore it's about time that we have a closer look at some AMD CPUs. Today we're going to check out AMDs A10-6800K and put it up against its predecessor t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-11-04, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  Maybe some of you are curious to see how close an AMD A10-6800K APU can come to an Intel Core i7-4770K. Obviously this article should not be seen as some kind of buying advice it's more about illustrating that the CPU isn't the most important piece of har...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-08-27, review by: vortez.net

  • Little need to overclock CPU due to high Turbo Core speeds out the box, Discrete level integrated graphics
  • Little performance gain over previous generation, Still using 32nm fab
  • Looking over at the latest 6000 series APUs, it is easy to be underwhelmed due by the fact they are 'just a refresh'. The primary benefit to the A10-6800K is the high out the box speeds, combined with a modest GPU overclock and some capable high perfo...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2013-07-18, Author: Marc , review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  With Haswell's IGP Intel had set itself ambitious goals. One for example is that they want to heat up the competition with AMD when it comes to integrated grahics performance. Wether Intel is going to succeed or not and how Intel's HD 4600 as well as AMD'...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-04, Author: Koen , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Late May we published a huge round-up of 45 desktop processors , followed by a review of Intel's fourth generation Core processors . Our readers immediately, and understandably, came with the request for a similar group test of laptop processors. It's a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-14, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Low power consumption when idle, GPU performance
  • Nothing really new, CPU performance

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2013-06-14, Author: Joel , review by: itproportal.com

  • A bit faster than the A10, 5800K, A tad more power efficient too, Adds support for DDR3, 2133
  • Relatively pricier than the A10, 5800K
  • If you care about peak CPU performance, a fast Intel dual-core or higher-end quad-core will deliver better overall performance than the AMD A10-6800K, even if the total cost will be somewhat more. If, on the other hand, you want a combined CPU+GPU with b...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2013-06-13, review by: kitguru.net

  • Improved power efficiency, Decent performance, Good value for money, Supports faster memory,
  • An impressive product that is a worthy upgrade from the previous generation....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
    page 5 of 19 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 19   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×