id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD A10-5800K 3.8GHz Socket FM2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD A10-5800K 3.8GHz Socket FM2

Testseek.com have collected 212 expert reviews of the AMD A10-5800K 3.8GHz Socket FM2 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD A10-5800K 3.8GHz Socket FM2.
 
(85%)
212 Reviews
Users
(92%)
644 Reviews
85 0 100 212

 

Reviews

page 3 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-10-14, review by: HardCOREware.net

  • Abstract:  Our AMD Trinity review comes about a week after launch, because I wanted to spend the extra time with this APU to be able to provide readers with as clear a picture as possible on every aspect of performance. On the following pages, you’ll be reading a...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-12, review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  For a majority of these open-source benchmarks on Ubuntu 12.10 with the Linux 3.5 kernel, the AMD A10-5800K was competitive with the Intel Core i5 2400S "Sandy Bridge" processor. In some tests the A10-5800K was slightly faster and in other cases a litt...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-10, review by: silentpcreview.com

  • Abstract:  AMD's new Trinity processor micro-architecture drives new APUs powered by 2nd gen Bulldozer (Piledriver) CPU cores and updated graphics chips for value systems on the new FM2 socket.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-07, review by: futurelooks.com

  • Abstract:  HOT New Post! - AMD’s Virgo Platform and Trinity A8-5600K / A10-5800K APUs Reviewed - Read it Now! AMD finally moves forward with implementing a completely new module architecture across its processors. This move has been met with a lot of controversy ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-04, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Abstract:  This week AMD released its latest generation of CPUs with integrated video, dubbed “Trinity.” The A10-5800K is currently the most high-end model available, running at 3.8 GHz and costing USD 130. Let’s see how it fares against its main competitor, the ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-03, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • Perhaps the key point to take away from our findings is that, while the unequivocal recommendation of the A10-5800K isn't going to find its way into this review, AMD has done exactly what it needed to do following the success of Llano. Trinity is much ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(81%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-03, Author: Scott , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  AMD's Trinity chip is making a debut, but it's not exactly a fresh face. We reviewed the mobile version of Trinity back in May and had mostly positive things to say about it. The second generation of AMD's do-everything, converged APU offered solid progre...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-03, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Excellent integrated graphics performance, adequate CPU horsepower for the price.
  • AMD is leaving the performance race all to Intel. New motherboard needed. Unlocked multiplier doesn't translate into good overclocking.
  • So far we've focused on the performance of AMD's new A10-5800K, but we've yet to touch on what is arguably the most important piece of the puzzle: its price. Out of the gate, AMD has priced its new chip at $130, which happens to match the Core i3-3220. Bu...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-02, Author: Matt , review by: computershopper.com

  • Much improved graphics performance over previous model, Competes well against similarly priced Intel Core i3 CPUs with weaker integrated graphics, Unlocked for overclocking
  • CPU-specific performance doesn't get as much of a boost as graphics, New FM2 socket means previous-gen AMD APU owners will need a new motherboard
  • AMD's latest high-end APU sports slightly improved CPU performance and nearly double the graphics muscle of last year's A8 chip. It's a good choice for those looking to build a budget gaming or media PC. Just know you'll need fast RAM to get the best per...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(70%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-02, review by: techpowerup.com

  • Excellent and affordable entry 3D rendering power, Decent expected iGPU clocking with all three of my chips managing a 25% or greater frequency increase, Low platform price, NEW Piledriver CPU core design, Support for up to two VGAs in CrossfireX with sup
  • Same maximum TDP as FM1 products, Perhaps a bit late to the market with laptop-grade parts already for sale, No compatibility with previous FM1 products, be it boards or chips, "Low" but adequate CPU Performance will not appeal to some
  • I poured out my thoughts about these APUs out on the front page. I like them a lot. Intel simply doesn't offer anything remotely close for the same budget when it comes to 3D performance. They aren't really meant to compete with Intel anyway, so you ar...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
    page 3 of 22 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×