Testseek.com have collected 275 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz Socket AM4.
June 2017
(88%)
275 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(98%)
62 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
880100275
Reviews
page 2 of 28
Order by:
Score
Published: 2018-04-13, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com
Abstract: The leaks have been flying hard and fast for weeks, but this morning, AMD is officially taking the wraps off its second-generation Ryzen CPUs. Four new chips have been waiting in the wings, and they'll be available for pre-order around the world starting...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2018-04-09, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
We've have a pretty good look at application and game performance. As expected Intel's faster in games for the most part, while AMD's faster for most of the heavy workloads we tested, that being the situation this is how I look at it. Even with a GTX 1080...
Published: 2018-03-15, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net
The R3 2200G offers highly competitive performance at its price and, ultimately, really has no immediate competition. At $100, the CPU offers 78-85% of the performance of the R5 2400G at 58% of the price. Not bad at all. We can strongly recommend the R3 2...
Published: 2017-10-31, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Abstract: Our most recent CPU roundup pitted Intel's 7th and 8th-gen Core i5 and Core i7s against AMD's Ryzen 5 and 7 by playing and benchmarking nine representative PC games at multiple resolutions. In total eight new CPUs were tested at their base clock speeds...
Ryzen platform is very stable now, 6-cores, 12-threads, Fully unlocked, Comes with CPU cooler, Great performance compared to Intel's i5-8400
Gaming performance still lacks, Single-threaded performance is still behind Intel
If you have read our review of the Ryzen 7 1700 from earlier this year you know that we complained at how untested and unstable the Ryzen platform really was at launch. I think that most people who reviewed or purchased Ryzen parts right when the platform...
Abstract: AMD Ryzen 3 vs Ryzen 5 vs Ryzen 7So far we have taken a close look at most of AMD's Ryzen line-up and, while there have been variances from model to model, overall both the Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 7 series have indeed lived up to expectations. Their combination...
Abstract: With the release of the Ryzen 7 series of CPUs by AMD this year certainly has been exciting times for enthusiast. For the first time in a long-time enthusiast's actually had options in the high-end desktop arena. So much so that the idea of opting for Int...
Published: 2017-07-21, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
I have to admit, this just seems wrong. I still can't get used to seeing AMD CPUs consuming less power than their Intel counterpart. It feels unnatural. Those power-hungry FX chips sat atop our power charts for so long and I'm glad we can finally move on...
Abstract: To date, we have poured over, examined, and tested the tar out of the eight-core Ryzen 7 processors currently available, but among the four- and six-core Ryzen 5 mainstream CPUs, we've barely begun. So far we have reviewed the Ryzen 5 1600X. Now it's time...
We can say the Ryzen 5 1600 is a version of the Ryzen 5 1600X with a lower clock. Therefore, it behaves as expected: in programs and games that take advantage of its twelve threads, it performs greatly, but in programs that don't use more than four thread...
