id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Olympus E-520



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Olympus E-520

Testseek.com have collected 62 expert reviews of the Olympus E-520 and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Olympus E-520.
Award: Most Awarded July 2008
July 2008
 
(81%)
62 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
81 0 100 62

 

Reviews

page 4 of 7
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2009-07-15, review by: Photoradar.com

  • Sadly neither of these made it through to the final design, which may disappoint some people who were hoping that the E-520 would havebeen a bargain-priced consumer version of the E-3.However, there's really no need to be disappointed. The twisty scree...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2009-01-01, review by: practicalphotography.com

  • While we were reviewing this camera, we couldn’t get past just how similar it is to the E-420. Yet when it comes down to price, it costs around £140 extra. In terms of extra features included for the price hike, the E-520 offers in-camera stabilisatio...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2008-11-25, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • While the Olympus E-520 is a solid choice overall, Sonys A350 and the Canon EOS 450D are also worth a look before stumping up the cash. Joanne Carter Lowest online price: ££399.00 Buy it now: click here ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2008-10-14, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Good image quality up to 800 ISO, AutoFocus system with Live View, Burst mode at 3 fps, Builtin stabilization and wireless flash control, Excellent antidust casing
  • AutoFocus too slow, viewfinder too narrow, Electronic noise handling could be better, Menus still too complicated, No face detector to turn off the LCD if youre using the viewfinder

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2008-10-09, review by: digitalartsonline.co.uk

  • Abstract:  As expected, shortly after news of the update to the tiny Olympus E-410 comes the replacement for the maker’s popular mid-range E-510. Like the E-420, the new model has seen some cosmetic improvements to the finish and controls. As a result, the E-520 ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2008-08-05, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Price, FourThirds system, handling, anti dust system, image stabilisation, image quality, feature set, metering, low noise, Live View
  • Modest 3-point AF set up, small viewfinder, white balance issues
  • Olympus’ replacement enthusiast flagship digital SLR, the E-520 lacks nothing in terms of specification and has a few improvements over is E-510 forbear. The cracking price makes it excellent value for money too...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-08-01, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Like the earlier entry-level Olympus E-420, the mid-range E-510 has undergone a revamp in the form of the E-520. Theres no change in the body shape, and viewed from the front, top and sides its essentially the same plastic case as the E-510s, albeit...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2008-07-02, review by: techradar.com

  • Vibrant pictures, Fantastic build quality, Good price, Nice to handle, Easy to use
  • Four-Thirds technology not for everyone

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-01-01, review by: letsgodigital.org/es/

  • Abstract:  La Olympus E-520 es la evolución lógica de la E-510. El año se acaba, con lo que un nuevo número de tipo atraerá de nuevo la atención hacia la marca. Sin embargo, decir solo eso no haría justicia a la Olympus E-520. Esta cámara digital cierra el frent...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(81%)
 
  Published: 2010-07-21, review by: betabuzz.de

  • gute Bildqualität, gutes Gehäuse, „Supersonic Wave Filter“, manuelle Einstellungen möglich
  • Rauschen ab ISO 800, teilweise zu starke Weichzeichnung, kein Sucher, geringe Batterieleistung
  • Die Olympus E-520 ist eine gute Einsteiger-Spiegelreflexkamera, die sich auch als Zweitgerät für Profis eignet. Die Bildqualität ist bei niedriger Lichtempfindlichkeit sehr gut. Auch die umfangreiche Ausstattung sowie das hochwertig verarbeitete Gehäu...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(72%)
    page 4 of 7 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×