id.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM

Testseek.com have collected 23 expert reviews of the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM.
 
(81%)
23 Reviews
Users
(95%)
190 Reviews
81 0 100 23

 

Reviews

page 2 of 3
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2006-12-01, review by: cameralabs.com

  • Extreme wide angle coverage, Well-corrected at wider focal lengths, Fast and quiet USM focusing motor, An exotic but affordable L lens
  • Zoom range too limited for general purpose, Soft corners at 40mm focused at infinity, Unimpressive macro capabilities, Light fall-off at wide angle (but expected)
  • Canon EF 17-40mm verdict The EF 17-40mm f/4.0L is one of the best lenses in Canon’s range. It brings you a taste of the truly exotic with ultra-wide coverage, while boasting ‘L’ quality all at a surprisingly affordable price. Sure it ain...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2006-09-01, review by: The-digital-picture.com

  • Abstract:  The Canon L Series Lenses is a high quality, moderately-priced ultra wide angle zoom lens. Although not as fast as the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L lens, the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Lens is a comparable lens in terms of image quality. The biggest dif...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-17, review by: itreviews.com

  • The Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM lens is an inexpensive alternative to the 16-35mm f/2.8, but its edges are muddy at its widest angle....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2017-12-16, Author: 陈亮 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • Abstract:  去年年底朋友开始对摄影感兴趣,询问笔者后购入了一款入门级单反套机。近日朋友再次致电笔者商讨升级事宜,笔者本来以为他要购买更好的 镜头 和配件,殊不知他决定彻底升级平台,现有的入门单反整体挂到闲鱼上出掉,升级产品确定为同品牌的中端机型。其实在摄影初哥中,这样的升级计划不在少数,虽然谈不上错误,但是从剩余价值利用、高性价比等方面来看,这样的升级确实有点浪费。今天笔者就和大家聊聊,摄影初学者升级器材的一些问题。入门单反性能不堪?早年间,入门单反、中端单反和全幅单反之间的性能差距还是非常明显的,市场定位上也比较清...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(93%)
 
  Published: 2017-11-29, Author: 龚明 , review by: zol.com.cn

  • ·配件篇 滤镜与三脚架需要格外注意最后我们来看一下相机配件的选购。相机配件虽然本身价值不如机身镜头高,但是往往更换频率高,而且容易闲置,所以配件交易往往也非常常见。配件交易中,问题很少有人提及,在实际交易中,最经常出问题的是两类,滤镜和三脚架。首先说滤镜,滤镜其实是消耗品不是耐用品,一方面滤镜容易受到磕碰挤压而损坏,另一方面,很多滤镜并不是纯粹的玻璃滤镜,镀膜往往没有相机镜头镀膜那么耐用,容易出现镀膜擦伤和镀膜老化。因此检查滤镜,最需要的是检查镀膜。从侧面观看镀膜是否有明显擦伤,对于高指数ND镜,检查镜片...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-12-31, Author: bichao , review by: xitek.com

  • Abstract:  EF 17-40 f/4 L USM以合适的价格,提供给用户优秀的成像质量,操作性能和手感,无论在传统单反相机上,还是在数码单反相机上使用,都非常合适。这里是一个17-40的俱乐部,欢迎拥有此头的泡菜多上片、上好片,以展示该镜的风采,共同交流使用心得。上片子、谈体会、以摄会友、就摄论摄是17/40俱乐部所倡导的正能量和大方向!该镜头参数:镜头结构: 12片/9组;水平视角: 104°-57°30';自动对焦驱动系统:USM ;对焦范围: 最近对焦距离:0.28m ;最大放大倍数: 0.24X ;卡口类型:...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-08-08, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Zudem ist der Zoombereich des KB-Objektivs etwas knapp, und ein Stabilisator fehlt, trotz des Preises von 690 Euro. Digital empfohlen. Technische Daten und TestergebnisseTechnische Daten Linsen, Gruppen12 Linsen, 9 Gruppenäquivalente KB-Brennweite, ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-01-18, review by: cyberbloc.de

  • Abstract:  Vorwort: Beginnen möchte ich mit zwei Sätzen zu meiner Person und warum ich diesen Beitrag so schreibe, wie er ist. Ich arbeite seit ca. vier Jahren nebenberuflich als Fotograf und betreue meine Kunden in den Bereichen Produkt- und Imagefotografie. Sei...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-09-16, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Das 17–40 (690 Euro) wird an der 7D zum vernünftigen Standardzoom ab dem maßvollen Weitwinkel 28 mm (äquivalenter KB-Wert). Die auch hier vorhandenen Schwächen in den Bildecken lassen sich durch Abblenden stark reduzieren. Die Verzeichnung ist nur bei...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(76%)
 
  Published: 2008-10-09, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Technische Daten und TestergebnisseTechnischen Daten Linsen, Gruppen12 Linsen, 9 GruppÄquivalente KB-Brennweite, AF-Bereich27,2–64 mm, 0,28-∞ meffektiver Bildwinkel diagonal76–37°Filter (Größe, Typ)77 mm, SchraubfilterLänge, Durchmesser, Gewicht97 ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 3 « Previous   1 2 3   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×