Testseek.com have collected 268 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 2700 3.2GHz Socket AM4.
May 2018
(82%)
268 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
820100268
Reviews
page 3 of 27
Order by:
Score
Published: 2018-04-19, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com
Abstract: With 2017 finished, and Ryzen being very successful for AMD, the inevitable question was due: what happens next? Early in 2018, the plans were laid bare: a second generation Ryzen processor was set to come in mid-year, followed by a second generation Thr...
Published: 2018-04-13, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com
Abstract: The leaks have been flying hard and fast for weeks, but this morning, AMD is officially taking the wraps off its second-generation Ryzen CPUs. Four new chips have been waiting in the wings, and they'll be available for pre-order around the world starting...
Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Steve , review by: gamersnexus.net
By name and by marketing, the i5 CPU is most comparable to the R5 CPUs. The R5 2600's current $160 price-point makes it a less direct comparison, and the 2600X, which would perform about where an overclocked 2600 performs, is about $220. This is also...
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700 does not only present a cost-efficient price for gamers who are budget-conscious, but it is also great for enthusiasts and overclockers who do not have enough cash to purchase flagship parts. The improvements and developments in manuf...
Strong multi core performance, Compatible with previous AM4 motherboards, Solid transcoding performance, Overclocks close to 2700X
– Wraith Spire cooler won't really support an overclock
When comparing the Ryzen 7 2700 to its predecessor, the 1700, we couldn't help but be impressed. It's faster, taps into more cores when it engages the boost clocks and has better memory compatibility. This is a clear step forward for Ryzen as a product.Th...
While we were super excited and impressed by the 2600X and 2700X, we found the 2600 and 2700 slightly less impressive, but still excellent values. For $30 more you are just paying AMD for a slight frequency boost, something you can do for free. While most...
Great value, Huge multi-thread performance, Overclockable,
Slower single-core performance than Intel, Poor overclocking headroom,
It's the same old story. AMD's latest chips are great value for certain tasks but less so for others. You get masses of multi-thread performance, but single-thread and gaming performance trails Intel's rival processors a little...
Abstract: It's the age-old question that has spurred endless debate: AMD or Intel? Today, that rivalry has reached new heights with AMD's Ryzen 2000 Series, often referred to by users (but not AMD) as "Ryzen 2," competing against Intel's 8th Gen "Coffee Lake" for d...
Faster than previous-gen Ryzen models, Bundled cooler adds value, Backward compatibility with 300-series motherboards, Indium solder improves thermal transfer
Needs a better cooler for overclocking, No value-oriented 400-series motherboards yet, Large performance deficit compared to a stock Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD's first-generation "non-X" Ryzen processors were universally hailed as budget champions. That changes with the company's 2000-series CPUs, though. Its Ryzen 7 2700 is only $30 cheaper than the 2700X. Given a choice between them, we'd rather have the f...
Published: 2018-05-16, Author: Andrew , review by: techteamgb.co.uk
Abstract: Is there any reason to buy an Intel CPU now that the AMD Ryzen 2700 and 2600 are out? Or even reason to get the X variants (2700X & 2600X)? Lets benchmark them and find out! Want one? Amazon 2700: prourls.co/5u0q Amazon 2600: prourls.co/0gwh Products show...
